12月25號玩完的感想

當日小弟係玩電車的，但因沒有分油電時段。所以覺得好亂。而且油車啲師兄，持住自己架車大隻，冇理人感受不停full雞。撞到人哋架車仲要俾油。因為佢哋停低就會死火。但係咪要撞爛人哋啲車先至安樂呢？我踝日同三架油車一齊跑，有兩架快啲，第三架因為要追車，便越過對面線來追車。然後與我迎面直撞我即時爛車。咁樣玩車我以後點玩呀！係咪叫我哋玩電車啲人唔好再幫襯呢！希望興仔可以分油電時段。每十五分鐘便最好的。謝謝

回復 22年 的帖子

唔知你回咗,要過咗年先了

ford 發表於 2012-1-8 19:21

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

回復 爆水喉 的帖子

爆師兄我記得你同thomas有一日同我哋爭包場

嘿嘿，咁我要快些修好架醫默屎先。

ford 發表於 2012-1-9 08:35

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

re 22年兄"""""""Ford兄你地玩大轆都唔預我>_<  
閒曰你也ok?我以為22兄你Ｄ大腳劏曬了

閒日機會就少D lu~~ 我D大腳仲0向度，只係成年都未郁過0者！

re 22年兄"""""""Ford兄你地玩大轆都唔預我>_<  
閒曰你也ok?我以為22兄你Ｄ大腳劏曬了

Marco明 發表於 2011-12-27 22:28

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

agree~~~比個5

YES! YES YES 絕對中, 車係無罪的, 只是錯在無人品的人形生物啊

回復 ford 的帖子

Ford兄!一於咁話,不過要平日

>>ford  mark哥你太多車車了<<

上星期先 run-in 好部 D8 的 GO engine, 但未收針

架 Salyer 才 run in 左副新偈7 成, 宜家重糸夾的

跟住兩架油電8.2 又要keep 住同佢地走 (爆菊花丫嗎)

架 ae SC10 4x4 剛剛執好車架同 setting, 準備同星期六個班高手死過

真糸太忙, 農曆年假要曰曰玩先得

回復 ford 的帖子

話時話我都未攞部Slayer同你地d 大脚走走

回復 爆水喉 的帖子

爆師兄我記得你同thomas有一日同我哋爭包場
下次閒曰約埋你吔倆個 e-maxx 大戰 savage.ok?
我d friend都好掛住你哋

包場或無朋支玩的時候就最好搞set 車, 整一樣試一樣好爽的.

三五知己走埋一齊, 一定忙著爆菊花的

爆水喉 發表於 2012-1-8 12:54

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

如果真係得一個人,我就唔入喇,小弟入親去都有個志同道合既好兄弟一齊去,有好多時平日入去全日都係得我同我朋 ...

一個人包場至過引

爆水喉 發表於 2012-1-8 12:54

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

如果真係得一個人,我就唔入喇,小弟入親去都有個志同道合既好兄弟一齊去,有好多時平日入去全日都係得我同我朋 ...

讃同！三五知巳一斉玩車真係人生一大楽事！

如果真係得一個人,我就唔入喇,小弟入親去都有個志同道合既好兄弟一齊去,有好多時平日入去全日都係得我同我朋友,兩架車玩晒成個場,你話過引唔過引

小弟都好怕果d唔守規則既朋友仔,所以我通常都係平日去mx度玩,玩得安全之外又有包場既感覺

回復 coolcooleric 的帖子

Just in very very simple word, Intention is not necessary in assault, you 無心 hurt him still most likely have criminal liability. But if you have intention, then the case will be worst! Say, the prosecution will charge you some more heavier indictment. Moreover, if you have intended to do so, then there not any mitigating factor for the judge sentencing decision. Just a very very example, say, assault max penalty is 5 year, then that one have intention may 5 year, and that 無心 is only 2 year. For the civil, no matter u have intention or not, the victim still entitle to bring a civil action against you. Intention or not may affect how much compensation the victim can get. It is a very very difficult question to discuss here. Once again, it is only some kind of friendly discussion and not any kind of formal legal advice.  But the case is exactly like the one stated in the newspaper. First is criminal, after that, it depends the victim claim you or not, if yes, then it is civil.

Still remember the TKO RC heli accidient case?
http://paper.wenweipo.com/2008/01/14/HK0801140005.htm

The result, no kidding, I remember the news said he end up being  put in the jail. Anyone can confirm?
http://the-sun.on.cc/cnt/news/20100319/00412_004.html

回復 supertenchung 的帖子

Just wondering in wt circumstances would be a criminal law or a civil law ?
Is it depend on whether the driver hv intention or not ? ( I mean in playing rc not a real car)

Marksman 發表於 2012-1-4 14:02

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

回復 supertenchung 的帖子

Thanks for further explaination. More question - how to define a reckle ...

'Be proactive to protect yourself is always far better than rely on people who don't know'

金句~~~完全贊同

I never park my car nearby the track