RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

標題: Russia Navy [打印本頁]

作者: TM麒 時間: 2008-12-4 23:01
標題: Russia Navy
http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=8FmRB7uqeCA&feature=related

作者: 周百通 時間: 2008-12-4 23:44
麒哥仔你哩條短片.......以經係一個答案

作者: 丘引 時間: 2008-12-5 19:56
唉？又買多隻戰艦喇

作者: koppie 時間: 2009-5-24 22:30
俄羅斯的海軍戰略思想同西方完全吾同﹐著重飽和式攻擊﹐ 所以造船風格好特別

作者: mwheel 時間: 2009-5-24 23:54
俄國軍艦個船頭好似比較圓渾D，好靚。

作者: Ang 時間: 2009-5-25 20:41

俄羅斯的海軍戰略思想同西方完全吾同﹐著重飽和式攻擊﹐ 所以造船風格好特別
koppie 發表於 2009-5-24 22:30

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

師兄,

Please explain, thanks.

作者: koppie 時間: 2009-5-25 21:24
本帖最後由 koppie 於 2009-5-25 21:40 編輯

Hi nice to have someone who is interested in this subject,

Here is a good paragraph written by ROC military magazine " 全球防衛誌 261 期（2006年5月）"
http://www.diic.com.tw/mag/mag261/261-56.htm
For copyright issue,therefore I only enclose part of the essay here
.........紅海軍為此歸納出「首輪齊射」的反航艦作戰原則，當遇到衝突不可避免時，己方艦隊將不顧一切地搶占有利戰位，利用自己飛彈在射程和破壞力的「不對稱優勢」，先發制人地將全部長程飛彈打出去，使敵艦隊在來不及作出反應前被消滅。根據俄羅斯海軍教案的論述，一次性對類似尼米茲級這樣的超級航艦的「三位一體」飽和攻擊，至少要達到90枚以上的飛彈攻擊，...................

Many of the Russian military doctrine carries from their WWII experience。 Does it remind you the battle of Kursk? With the numerous T-34 out fought the technology superior German Tiger ?
Of course American stress on Fire power as well, but no one on earth has their military budget to spend, and unlimited government bond to print for Chinese to buy , LOL.

可以話就像一貫俄羅斯D野，在有限的成本下，造出最兇蠻的火力網.

我個人就覺得好有暴力美...

作者: koppie 時間: 2009-5-25 22:14
讓我介紹兩个更加能感受俄風的Video，吾好意思，我一路都是跟開陸軍野，暫時找不到好的全海軍Video

俄軍的招兵電視廣告，講一對朋友，一個加入了海軍陸戰隊，一个加入了空降兵。
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHmiqmfNLhE&feature=related

看完这個video,你會明白你遇見到盜賊好過見到俄國特種兵
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVsclRU111Y

俄國海軍陸戰隊
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ANhzk-_CF4&feature=related

作者: Ang 時間: 2009-5-26 13:20

Here is a good paragraph written by ROC military magazine " 全球防衛誌 261 期（2006年5月）"

師兄,

Just read the article, very informative of the Russia Navy's strategy. I suppose China is copying Russia's way because both countries are similar in many ways with lack of resources, correct?

Agree that the 飽和式攻擊 would be effective in close range but the Americans would not be that stupid to come into the firing range so would the Americans try to counter this strategy by keeping the fleet off the weapon range?

作者: koppie 時間: 2009-5-28 19:27
１。 In fact their needs are very different due to dissimilar geographer location and coast line. The reasons you see PLAN having a significant Russian fleet is due to political background. Detail would be beyond the scope of this forum.

2. Saturated attack, could be delivered by the mean of small arms to ICBM, the effective range of Kirov class is 450-550KM , which is about the distance from Hong Kong to 台南.
[Kirov 基洛夫級戰鬥巡洋艦] http://www.jkforum.net/thread-456200-1-6.html

歡迎光臨 RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區 (https://jk.rc-evo.com/xbbs/)