LCG V10 1:10 4wd 房車 - RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

作者: chrishkyung 時間: 2009-8-20 09:59
1) the weight distribution is not good enough.  Battery at front and motor at rear.  The weight distribution is not well centralized at mid point along longitutional axle. It will affect the corner entry...it could be reflected from the performance using similar design like Losi , Team Magic..

2) The suspension arm is too short.  The camber change will be large while the suspension is up and down.  Its no good for rubber tire running....for rubber tire, chassis rolling is important...In conclusion, short arm design is workable for sponge tire only

3) the suspension arm seem not durable enough

4) nearly 3.5mm thick aluminium chassis plate....no flexibility...Again, its for sponge tire only.  3.5mm aluminium plate without 2nd floor ....I believe after few runs, the chassis will be tweaked already

Its good for eye sight appreciation but no good for actual running

作者: 丘比凸 時間: 2009-8-20 10:05
好似好正@@

作者: batcat 時間: 2009-8-20 10:39
It look like a E4 EVO-IFS ! Good design, it avoid the battery weight balancing. Awaiting for bulk!

Thanks for sharing.

作者: wochch 時間: 2009-8-20 10:51
好正喎!!

作者: iggihk 時間: 2009-8-20 11:39

1) the weight distribution is not good enough. Battery at front and motor at rear. The weight distribution is not well centralized at mid point along longitutional axle. It will affect the corner ...
chrishkyung 發表於 2009-8-20 09:59

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

How come I can't see the aluminium chassis plate you are talking about?

作者: 山久和也 時間: 2009-8-20 11:39
新車?出左未GA?!

作者: Aurora 時間: 2009-8-20 11:41
15# batcat

係國外論壇留意咗呢部車好耐, 主要想看會否有video或否賽後結果, 據說在10月中後會參一場cleveland的Hallowin classic(較大的賽事), 希望有料到啦。

作者: leotsun 時間: 2009-8-20 11:43
本帖最後由 leotsun 於 2009-8-20 11:44 編輯

2) The suspension arm is too short. The camber change will be large while the suspension is up and down. Its no good for rubber tire running....for rubber tire, chassis rolling is important...In conclusion, short arm design is workable for sponge tire only
chrishkyung 發表於 2009-8-20 09:59

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

佢唔係已經用左double wishbone......長短應該冇關係的 @.@

作者: edmondhk 時間: 2009-8-20 11:46
比人射尾的話,枝油壓

作者: Xraylover 時間: 2009-8-20 17:29

How come I can't see the aluminium chassis plate you are talking about?
iggihk 發表於 2009-8-20 11:39

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Please look in details...the main chassis is comprised of two surface carbon fibre(sticker) but the inner is aluminium....

作者: Xraylover 時間: 2009-8-20 17:36
[quote]

佢唔係已經用左double wishbone......長短應該冇關係的 @.@
leotsun 發表於 2009-8-20 11:43

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

[/quote

what is double wishbone? u meant those twin adjustment screw at the camber link? this design is for adjustment of caster angle only...how can this can solve the camber change problem in too short suspension arm? I suggest go to get m05, normal touring car, buggy car to check check their camber change while the suspension arms are up and down....u will find that the shorter suspension arm, more camber change is found...

作者: Xraylover 時間: 2009-8-20 17:39
If this car is so-called "fantastic" in design, any winning competition proof it?

作者: Marco明 時間: 2009-8-20 17:41

Please look in details...the main chassis is comprised of two surface carbon fibre(sticker) but the inner is aluminium....
Xraylover 發表於 2009-8-20 17:29

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

原來貼紙黎.......fake哂

作者: kkchung 時間: 2009-8-20 21:43
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ti ... 06910.2403488919..1

http://tigermothracing.com

作者: chrishkyung 時間: 2009-8-20 22:17

If this car is so-called "fantastic" in design, any winning competition proof it?
Xraylover 發表於 2009-8-20 17:39

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

100% agree

作者: INEO 時間: 2009-8-20 22:46
傳動系統跟油車相似

作者: lkwmic 時間: 2009-8-28 17:11
好似在設計上不是太平衡！

歡迎光臨 RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區 (https://jk.rc-evo.com/xbbs/)