RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

標題: 皮帶車同軸車??? [打印本頁]

作者: S20002330 時間: 2007-2-10 01:34
標題: 皮帶車同軸車???
大家如果有錢買車，但只可買一架
大家會選擇皮帶車還是軸車???
其實佢地有d咩優點缺點???

作者: kelvinblstz 時間: 2007-2-10 01:41
皮帶車較高級~

架車定d

車價貴d

多野改d;P
負荷低d;P

作者: kaho0338 時間: 2007-2-10 01:49

原帖由 kelvinblstz 於 2007-2-10 01:41 發表
皮帶車較高級~
架車定d
車價貴d
多野改d;P
負荷低d;P

how about evo5 ? ;P

作者: GigaRacer 時間: 2007-2-10 01:52
Belt is the trend...

415, T2, RDX, Kyosho..... HPI changed from Pro4 to Cyclone, Assoicated changed from TC4 to TC5.

作者: gibson 時間: 2007-2-10 02:34
I pick belt, more reliable and need less maintainance.

The gears inside shaft car are more easy to break!!

作者: adykahung 時間: 2007-2-10 07:40
belt drive:
pro: good for race, good handle
Con: easy to lose tooth in the belt, need to ajust the tension of belt periodically, not good for drift

Shaft drive:
Pro: good for drift, fast acceleration, not easy to break tooth on gear
Con: big or small cornering

i support shaft drive, coz i like drift more than race. so if someone like race, choose belt drive. if someone like drift, choose shaft drive.

All opinions come from Master degree Mechanical Engineer <--- me~~~

作者: kelvinblstz 時間: 2007-2-10 09:24

原帖由 adykahung 於 2007-2-10 07:40 發表
belt drive:
pro: good for race, good handle
Con: easy to lose tooth in the belt, need to ajust the tension of belt periodically, not good for drift(呢句搞笑~我拎架 03drift比你睇好唔好)

Shaft drive:
Pro: good for drift, fast acc ...

作者: lespaul 時間: 2007-2-10 12:56
[quote]原帖由 adykahung 於 2007-2-10 07:40 發表
belt drive:
pro: good for race, good handle
Con: easy to lose tooth in the belt, need to ajust the tension of belt periodically, not good for drift
..................................................
i support shaft drive, coz i like drift more than race. so if someone like race, choose belt drive. if someone like drift, choose shaft drive.

All opinions come from Master degree Mechanical Engineer <--- me~~~

WWWWWah.........

作者: yuiche 時間: 2007-2-10 15:18
TA03F PRO先至係drift王者......50/50比重....

作者: kelvinblstz 時間: 2007-2-10 15:31

我有4架03........有排炒啦

作者: bcgg 時間: 2007-2-12 15:24

原帖由 kelvinblstz 於 2007-2-10 15:31 發表
我有4架03........有排炒啦

我都有4架03+起碼八架03嘅Spare Parts,可以玩到2020

作者: bcgg 時間: 2007-2-12 15:31

原帖由 lespaul 於 2007-2-10 12:56 發表
原帖由 adykahung 於 2007-2-10 07:40 發表
belt drive:
pro: good for race, good handle
Con: easy to lose tooth in the belt, need to ajust the tension of belt periodically, not good for drift
... ...

Have you try TA03F/R drift before?

作者: kelvinblstz 時間: 2007-2-12 17:28

我唔識DRIFT嫁..........
我都想搵下網友教下我玩........

作者: kit912 時間: 2007-2-12 18:12

原帖由 bcgg 於 2007-2-12 15:24 發表

我都有4架03+起碼八架03嘅Spare Parts,可以玩到2020

嘩..唔洗愁無parts用呀

作者: bcgg 時間: 2007-2-12 18:21

原帖由 kit912 於 2007-2-12 18:12 發表
嘩..唔洗愁無parts用呀

我係–個無藥可醫嘅病人,身邊嘅女人不停買衫,我就.......

唔好離題......到底皮帶定直軸呢.......???

作者: kelvinblstz 時間: 2007-2-12 18:25
TA03~最特別既係有好多變化~
同埋一樣同以上一D行鏈既電車一樣~
係一條過的~

直接既程度

作者: cHRisTiAN 時間: 2007-2-12 20:42

原帖由 kelvinblstz 於 2007-2-12 18:25 發表
TA03~最特別既係有好多變化~
同埋一樣同以上一D行鏈既電車一樣~
係一條過的~
直接既程度

我覺得只有玩drift既人先會當TA-03係寶.
玩平路的話,神早放棄TA-03.
仲有,睇黎你唔係好知單皮帶有咩缺點.

作者: kelvinblstz 時間: 2007-2-13 13:26
^~^
TA03~玩平路~XDXD晚了10年了.......
即係你拎架86落場~同埋SWIFT落場~緊係係07年啦~

咁拎架同期小小~TT01 同TA04~都..........
自己諗下吧~.......雖然我唔識姐

作者: Deemax 時間: 2007-2-16 12:34

原帖由 adykahung 於 2007-2-10 07:40 發表
belt drive:
pro: good for race, good handle
Con: easy to lose tooth in the belt, need to ajust the tension of belt periodically, not good for drift

Shaft drive:
Pro: good for drift, fast acc ...

Agree

因為我用BD飄,set極都唔夠 LCG & CGM 咁好飄,但係入灣就比前兩者快,出灣就.....

[ 本帖最後由 Deemax 於 2007-2-16 12:42 編輯 ]

歡迎光臨 RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區 (https://jk.rc-evo.com/xbbs/)