RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

 找回密碼
 新玩家註冊
搜索
12
返回列表 發新帖
樓主: t2
打印 上一主題 下一主題
收起左側

我都加入了DB01行列

[複製鏈接]
21#
Marco明 發表於 2009-3-12 18:18:14 | 只看該作者
22#
 樓主| t2 發表於 2009-3-12 18:24:16 | 只看該作者


好呀!  請問師兄喎邊道玩車車呀?
23#
Marco明 發表於 2009-3-12 18:57:49 | 只看該作者
原帖由 t2 於 2009-3-12 18:24 發表


好呀!  請問師兄喎邊道玩車車呀?

我部車落過地一次咋.....黎緊計劃會去TKO玩~~~
24#
 樓主| t2 發表於 2009-3-12 19:41:48 | 只看該作者
原帖由 Marco明 於 2009-3-12 18:57 發表

我部車落過地一次咋.....黎緊計劃會去TKO玩~~~


我應該會去TRC, 因為TRC搬左之後都未有時間試過去佢既buggy場玩.
25#
Eddie168 發表於 2009-3-12 21:49:30 | 只看該作者
原帖由 t2 於 2009-3-12 12:45 發表


Are u talking about the shock tower (M parts)?  I've changed them to carbon reinforced ones, hopefully to be stronger (I guess).


I personally prefere using the orginal tower because carbon reinforce ones are strong but they are brittle (they can't flex as much as the orginal ones) so if they hit something they tend to snap straight away but the orginal ones flex so can absorb some of the force
26#
 樓主| t2 發表於 2009-3-12 22:01:03 | 只看該作者
原帖由 Eddie168 於 2009-3-12 21:49 發表


I personally prefere using the orginal tower because carbon reinforce ones are strong but they are brittle (they can't flex as much as the orginal ones) so if they hit something they tend to snap  ...


Let me do a crash test and see which one is stronger!  
27#
mlee 發表於 2009-3-13 14:34:04 | 只看該作者
原帖由 Eddie168 於 2009-3-12 21:49 發表


I personally prefere using the orginal tower because carbon reinforce ones are strong but they are brittle (they can't flex as much as the orginal ones) so if they hit something they tend to snap  ...



Totally agreed with this C-Hing.  
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 新玩家註冊

本版積分規則

手機版|小黑屋|RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房

GMT+8, 2025-1-12 19:44 , Processed in 0.087141 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表