"Stock" 的將來會係點 ?

近期見好多 ESC 都出 stock spec , 令到 stock motor 有 modify 既表現. 如果純以 performance 既角度, stock spec 既 "stock" 同 modify 似乎已經有 d 模糊...
其實當初有 "stock" class 既意義係咪想 d 車無咁快, 大家差唔多, 係鬥技術唔係鬥車快?
如果係咁, 咁依家個個用 stock spec 係咪令到 "stock" class 無左原來個意義?
聽講 d 大賽既 stock 比賽好似都 ban 左 stock spec.
大家覺得 stock 既將來會點?
"stock" 同 "modify" 會唔會愈黎愈模糊?
(絕無對 stock spec 負面意見, 只想討論, 不喜勿插...)

一個走高轉, 一個走低扭
車愈來愈快係好事~
最好市面上部部車都快到控制唔到
到時就考車手技術& SETTING吧
也不失運動意義

E個問題好簡單STOCK 要用LIFE 6．6V 咪得LOR

回復 1# librayiu

This is a common direction of all kinds of motor sport....  Unless you've a tight control race that even your car is supplied by officials, otherwise, even if you've all sorts of rules governing this and that, people will squeeze every bits and pieces to the maximum!!  Look at Formula One!

stock係要出狗招,modified先係技術

回復 5# 肥神

咩道理呀？

想買摩打同esc唔知點買好

will play modify after play stock.

look what Hara had done on ETS, he played modify also boost turbo as we play stock. so , just make ourselves progress for the future

其實只要限制stock用無感摩打就得, 因為turbo/boost mode 用唔到o係sensorless 既摩打上
有錯請指正

"binary" 師兄以 f1 做例子, 絕對正確. stock 組都係一樣. 同一個 cycle: initial rules -> 有人搵到 loop hole or 有新技術 -> 太快 -> 新 rules 令到慢返 d -> 又有人搵到 loop hole or 又有新技術 -> 又 revise rules ....
我睇 ROAR 既 ESC approval list, LRP stock spec 雖然可用不過唔可以用 advance timing, 即係唔俾用 turbo. 呢個情況就係上面既 cycle 咁.

明白技術層面上大家都會想盡辦法去令架車o係唔 violate rules 既前題下有咁快得咁快. 不過我更想 focus on 意義層面上討論. "stock" 呢個 class 本身意義係咩? "stock spec" 令到 stock 再唔係 stock, 係咪即係 stock 原本既意義已經無左?

stock係要出狗招,modified先係技術
肥神 發表於 2010-6-27 16:50

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

呢句很正......

回復 12# kinbe

因為係事實好多人玩完stock比賽,覺得根本係2回事....跑去玩modified無襟嬲