RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

 找回密碼
 新玩家註冊
搜索
查看: 3711|回復: 18
打印 上一主題 下一主題
收起左側

皮帶車同軸車???

 關閉 [複製鏈接]
跳轉到指定樓層
1#
S20002330 發表於 2007-2-10 01:34:18 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
大家如果有錢買車,但只可買一架
大家會選擇皮帶車還是軸車???
其實佢地有d咩優點缺點???
單選投票, 共有 81 人參與投票
71.60% (58)
28.40% (23)
您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
2#
kelvinblstz 發表於 2007-2-10 01:41:17 | 只看該作者
皮帶車較高級~
架車定d
車價貴d
多野改d;P
負荷低d;P
3#
kaho0338 發表於 2007-2-10 01:49:43 | 只看該作者
原帖由 kelvinblstz 於 2007-2-10 01:41 發表
皮帶車較高級~
架車定d
車價貴d
多野改d;P
負荷低d;P


how about evo5 ? ;P
4#
GigaRacer 發表於 2007-2-10 01:52:22 | 只看該作者
Belt is the trend...

415, T2, RDX, Kyosho..... HPI changed from Pro4 to Cyclone, Assoicated changed from TC4 to TC5.
5#
gibson 發表於 2007-2-10 02:34:54 | 只看該作者
I pick belt, more reliable and need less maintainance.  

The gears inside shaft car are more easy to break!!
6#
adykahung 發表於 2007-2-10 07:40:51 | 只看該作者
belt drive:
pro: good for race, good handle
Con: easy to lose tooth in the belt, need to ajust the tension of belt periodically, not good for drift

Shaft drive:
Pro: good for drift, fast acceleration, not easy to break tooth on gear
Con: big or small cornering

i support shaft drive, coz i like drift more than race. so if someone like race, choose belt drive. if someone like drift, choose shaft drive.

All opinions come from Master degree Mechanical Engineer <--- me~~~
7#
kelvinblstz 發表於 2007-2-10 09:24:14 | 只看該作者
原帖由 adykahung 於 2007-2-10 07:40 發表
belt drive:
pro: good for race, good handle
Con: easy to lose tooth in the belt, need to ajust the tension of belt periodically, not good for drift(呢句搞笑~我拎架 03drift比你睇好唔好)

Shaft drive:
Pro: good for drift, fast acc ...
8#
lespaul 發表於 2007-2-10 12:56:57 | 只看該作者
[quote]原帖由 adykahung 於 2007-2-10 07:40 發表
belt drive:
pro: good for race, good handle
Con: easy to lose tooth in the belt, need to ajust the tension of belt periodically, not good for drift
..................................................
i support shaft drive, coz i like drift more than race. so if someone like race, choose belt drive. if someone like drift, choose shaft drive.

All opinions come from Master degree Mechanical Engineer <--- me~~~

WWWWWah.........
9#
yuiche 發表於 2007-2-10 15:18:45 | 只看該作者
TA03F PRO先至係drift王者......50/50比重....
10#
kelvinblstz 發表於 2007-2-10 15:31:36 | 只看該作者
我有4架03........有排炒啦
11#
bcgg 發表於 2007-2-12 15:24:43 | 只看該作者
原帖由 kelvinblstz 於 2007-2-10 15:31 發表
我有4架03........有排炒啦


我都有4架03+起碼八架03嘅Spare Parts,可以玩到2020
12#
bcgg 發表於 2007-2-12 15:31:13 | 只看該作者
原帖由 lespaul 於 2007-2-10 12:56 發表
原帖由 adykahung 於 2007-2-10 07:40 發表
belt drive:
pro: good for race, good handle
Con: easy to lose tooth in the belt, need to ajust the tension of belt periodically, not good for drift
... ...


Have you try TA03F/R drift before?
13#
kelvinblstz 發表於 2007-2-12 17:28:16 | 只看該作者
我唔識DRIFT嫁..........
我都想搵下網友教下我玩........
14#
kit912 發表於 2007-2-12 18:12:23 | 只看該作者
原帖由 bcgg 於 2007-2-12 15:24 發表


我都有4架03+起碼八架03嘅Spare Parts,可以玩到2020
嘩..唔洗愁無parts用呀
15#
bcgg 發表於 2007-2-12 18:21:07 | 只看該作者
原帖由 kit912 於 2007-2-12 18:12 發表
嘩..唔洗愁無parts用呀


我係–個無藥可醫嘅病人,身邊嘅女人不停買衫,我就.......

唔好離題......到底皮帶定直軸呢.......???
16#
kelvinblstz 發表於 2007-2-12 18:25:57 | 只看該作者
TA03~最特別既係有 好多變化~
同埋一樣同以上一D行鏈既電車一樣~
係一條過的~
直接既程度
17#
cHRisTiAN 發表於 2007-2-12 20:42:02 | 只看該作者
原帖由 kelvinblstz 於 2007-2-12 18:25 發表
TA03~最特別既係有 好多變化~
同埋一樣同以上一D行鏈既電車一樣~
係一條過的~
直接既程度

我覺得只有玩drift既人先會當TA-03係寶.
玩平路的話,神早放棄TA-03.
仲有,睇黎你唔係好知單皮帶有咩缺點.
18#
kelvinblstz 發表於 2007-2-13 13:26:36 | 只看該作者
^~^
TA03~玩平路~XDXD晚了10年了.......
即係你拎架86落場~同埋SWIFT落場~緊係係07年啦~
咁拎架同期小小~TT01 同TA04~都..........
自己諗下吧~.......雖然我唔識姐
19#
Deemax 發表於 2007-2-16 12:34:50 | 只看該作者
原帖由 adykahung 於 2007-2-10 07:40 發表
belt drive:
pro: good for race, good handle
Con: easy to lose tooth in the belt, need to ajust the tension of belt periodically, not good for drift

Shaft drive:
Pro: good for drift, fast acc ...

Agree因為我用BD飄,set極都唔夠 LCG & CGM 咁好飄,但係入灣就比前兩者快,出灣就.....

[ 本帖最後由 Deemax 於 2007-2-16 12:42 編輯 ]
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 新玩家註冊

本版積分規則

手機版|小黑屋|RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房

GMT+8, 2024-11-16 11:58 , Processed in 0.053131 second(s), 18 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表