3pm 2.4g版同3pk 之間ge性能差距大不大?

主題已刪除~~~~~~~~~~~

[ 本帖最後由 aoieong 於 2008-1-15 22:14 編輯 ]

The functions of 3pm and 3pk are totally different!  3pm is mid class and 3pk is the top of the line.  
Or if you are only using two channels and you do not need any additional functions, like throttle speed, timer, expotenial, sub trim etcs. ................

3pm is good choice for beginner to expert!!   3pk only for experts!!

你ge意思係唔係姐係3pm 其實同普通ge 控冇咩分別? 只不過係轉左2.4g???
咁如果我真係諗住長期玩, 係咪買3pk會好d呢~!?

If playing EP car, to be honest, 3pm fits most of the case in function-wise. However, 3pk offers more than enough functions plus a better (more fancy) interface. To me, the most important feature in 3pk is the ability to change the steering wheel position. The heavy weight of 3pk also give a better balance (quite personal). Re-sale value is any factor. In a word, 3pk is more worth buying in team of function, finishing (this affect the physical feel of steering wheel and throttle trigger), and re-sale value. If playing GP car, 3pk's value become more obvious. However, it is unknown if there is any different in the electronic processing internally between 3pm and 3pk. IMO I would suggest you buy the 3pk if you have enough money.

其實這問題好多新手都想知包括我，兩種控其實敏感度會不會有分別？如果AM控同2.4G控敏感度又有何分別？
有冇帥兄何幫手說明？謝謝

If using 2.4G's HRS, according to Futaba, it has longer data string then conventional HRS. Which means it has higher resolution. But for responsive, it is hard to know. You are talking about comparing the signal carrying method. It is taking about the frame rate, signal recover method and so on. Only a real test can tell. But if you compare conventional PPM and HRS, HRS gives a feel of faster response. Because HRS draw out all the potential of digital servo. HRS mode gives a more linear power to digital servo

To me, the most important feature in 3pk is the ability to change the steering wheel position???
你ge意思係3pm冇依個功能? 依個咁基本ge功能都冇??

同埋我有個問題, 就係咩係  3 CHANNELS??